Widebelt Sanding Schedule -- for Doors
From contributor M:
If our doors are close, we start with 120, followed by 150, then 180. We use a random orbit with either 120 or 150 depending on whether it will be painted or stained. We do this on the front and back.
We use the following guidelines for grits and depth of pass:
Of course these are guidelines. You can take more off with narrower material, maybe less with wider material. We have an ammeter to help us determine the load.
And then there are some species, like maple, that will burn if you walk past it too fast. Light passes work for us.
From contributor W:
I think the responses above underestimate the power and benefits of the widebelt. First, I would skip more grits for each successive sanding. Start with 100, 180 next, finish with 220 or 240. It sands just as fast to widebelt down to 220, but you can clean up the crossgrain scratches faster if they are 220 or 240 than if they are 150 or 180, and if you miss some scratches they will at least be harder to see. You will have to play with the removal rate for each different species of wood. That is, if your machine is variable speed.
From contributor D:
One important factor is whether or not you have a platen. Would make a huge difference using it on the final pass of finish paper. That is another use of paper for your finer grits and cloth for the coarser grits. With hard maple we start with 100, 150, 220 with platen down about .04.
From Brian Personett, forum technical advisor:
Here’s how we did it when we were doing residential cabinetry, and it worked very well for us. We were using S4S material, so there was no rough lumber involved. We were also buying edge-glued panels that were already sanded smooth when we got them.
For RP doors, our framestock is 13/16?thick. I’ll just list out here the face, grit, and thickness setting.
Back 100 .800?
By this stage all joints should be smooth; if not you need to look at your shaper setup.
Front 120 .760?
At this stage our door is actually ¾” thick, so we would put the edge profile on it. We were using Voorwood’s Turbo Sand system and it worked best that we had ¾” doors before we profiled and sanded the profiles.
Back to the widebelt:
I would set the platen here and just lower it about .005?with each pass from here.
Front 180 w/platen
When doing cherry or hard maple, stop at 220, as both species tend to glaze over and make staining a bigger hassle than it already is. Also, when doing solid wood doors, i.e., no cross sand marks, we would stop at 180. I don’t know of many people who go all the way to 240, but for us the main thing was it took very little to clean it up with an orbital. I figured it was faster and easier to run the doors through the widebelt another pass versus the extra time it would take with an orbital. For what it's worth, we sanded all solid wood with 180 grit 5?Stik-its and all veneer with 220 grit 5?Stik-its, specifically 3M’s Tri-M-Ite, a Silicon Carbide abrasive. On our widebelts we used 3M’s Aluminum Oxide abrasive, Three-M-Ite. For the 100 and lower grits I used the Y weight cloth with the anti-static coating. For the 120+ grits I used X weight cloth again with the anti-static coating. For 180+ you can look into using paper backed belts, but the problem I had with them was they would tear when taken on and off the machine. I never really had an issue with the durability of them. I am mentioning brand names here because it took me a fair amount of time to come up with this system, and it worked flawlessly for us. 3M also spent a fair amount of time here helping me through this. Yes, there are cheaper products out there, but the support I got from 3M was more than I could have asked for, and I feel like specifically 3M’s products were integral to our process.
Once you come up with a system that works for you, follow it. Saving five minutes on the widebelt suddenly doesn’t look so good when you’ve got a bunch of doors that have to be refinished.
Would you like to add information to this article?
Interested in writing or submitting an article?
Have a question about this article?
Have you reviewed the related Knowledge Base areas below?